Plasma Amyloid and in vivo Brain Amyloid in Late Middle-Aged Hispanics.

TitlePlasma Amyloid and in vivo Brain Amyloid in Late Middle-Aged Hispanics.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2022
AuthorsRippon B, Palta P, Tahmi M, Sherwood G, Soto L, Cespedes S, Mesen Y, He H, Laing K, Moreno H, Teresi J, Razlighi Q, Brickman AM, Zetterberg H, Luchsinger JA
JournalJ Alzheimers Dis
Volume87
Issue3
Pagination1229-1238
Date Published2022
ISSN1875-8908
KeywordsAge Factors, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Apolipoproteins E, Biomarkers, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Positron-Emission Tomography
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determining amyloid positivity is possible with cerebrospinal fluid and brain imaging of amyloid, but these methods are invasive and expensive.

OBJECTIVE: To relate plasma amyloid-β (Aβ), measured using Single-molecule array (Simoatrademark) assays, to in vivo brain Aβ, measured using positron emission tomography (PET), examine the accuracy of plasma Aβ to predict brain Aβ positivity, and the relation of APOE ɛ4 with plasma Aβ.

METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis in a cohort of 345 late middle-aged Hispanic men and women (age 64 years, 72% women). Our primary plasma variable was Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio measured with Simoa. Brain Aβ burden was measured as global SUVR with 18F-Florbetaben PET examined continuously and categorically.

RESULTS: Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was inversely associated with global Aβ SUVR (β= -0.13, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.23, -0.03; p = 0.013) and Aβ positivity (Odds Ratio: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.91; p = 0.016), independent of demographics and APOE ɛ4. ROC curves (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.82; p < 0.0001) showed that the optimal threshold for plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio in relation to brain Aβ positivity was 0.060 with a sensitivity of 82.4% and specificity of 62.8%. APOE ɛ4 carriers had lower Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and a higher Aβ positivity determined with the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio threshold of 0.060.

CONCLUSION: Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio assayed using Simoa is weakly correlated with in vivo brain amyloid and has limited accuracy in screening for amyloid positivity and for studying risk factors of brain amyloid burden when in vivo imaging is not feasible.

DOI10.3233/JAD-210391
Alternate JournalJ Alzheimers Dis
PubMed ID35466933
Grant ListP30 AG028741 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
K24 AG045334 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
R01 AG050440 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
P30 AG059303 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
RF1 AG051556 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States